The stir caused by theory suggests that researchers have not explored all sides of the safety issue concerning potentially hazardous situations at Yucca Mountain.
The stir caused by theory suggests that researchers have not explored all sides of the safety issue concerning potentially hazardous situations at Yucca Mountain.Tags: Are Humans To Blame For Global Warming EssayEssay Peace NonviolenceEssay On Frodo Baggins In Of The RingResearch Papers On DwarfismDesigner Baby Research PaperIll Treatment Of Girl Child EssayAp Statistics Homework
To avoid losing an important source of energy, a safe and economical place to keep this waste is necessary.
This document proposes a literature review of whether Yucca Mountain is a suitable site for a nuclear waste repository.
Rather, I will discuss qualitatively how well Yucca Mountain meets each criterion.
In some situations, disagreement exists among experts as to how well Yucca Mountain meets a criterion. In this assessment, only Yucca Mountain will be considered as a possible site.
There are at least a dozen young volcanoes within 40 kilometers of the proposed Yucca Mountain waste site [Weiss, 1996].
The proximity of Yucca Mountain to these volcanoes makes it possible to have a volcanic eruption pass through the spent fuel waste repository.
Such a volcanic eruption could release damaging amounts of radioactivity to the environment.
According to the Department of Energy (DOE), a repository for high-level radioactive waste must meet several criteria including safety, location, and economics [Roush, 1995].
Another safety concern is the possibility of a volcanic eruption in Yucca Mountain.
The long-term nuclear waste storage facility needs to remain stable for at least 10,000 years to allow the radioactive isotopes to decay to natural levels [Clark, 1997].