Derrida’s ethical position is established through the duality of his deconstructive philosophy.
Derrida’s ethical position is established through the duality of his deconstructive philosophy.Tags: Radiologic Technologist CourseworkProblem Solving With DecimalsWiki Critical ThinkingCosmetic Surgery Pros And Cons EssayDouble Spaced Essay FormatReflective Essay Middle SchoolNurse Essay
4 which is a response to the work of Emmanuel Lévinas.
Lévinas argued that ethics is first philosophy and supported this with a phenomenology in which the same (the “I”) can only exist in relation to its own transcendence.
2 He refers to “a critical crossroads of semantic (or, if you prefer, etymologico-institutional) filiations and an aporetic crossroads or a sort of double postulation, contradictory double moment, double constraint or double bind” (Derrida 2000, 12).3 This is a version of the two kinds of deconstruction, or interpretation, that Derrida discussed on various occasions.
The semantic or etymologico-institutonal aspect refers to Heidegger in his appeal to etymology and his search, or nostalgia, for Being.
“Hostipitality” itself contains ethical discussion in the context of Kant’s philosophy and the literature of Pierre Klossowski, and an etymological discussion.
The concern with “Hospitality” comes from Kant in the context of his republican political philosophy.
The second pole is affirmative as in the yes-saying of Nietzsche and the double “yes” in the last chapter of Joyce’s .
The first pole is more negative in its rejection of the empirical in order to find some unifying point of transcendence, though always with regard to the impossibility of the pure presence of a pure presence unaffected by representation, repetition and difference.
Hospitality is a question of how we treat immigrants and refugees in the current political context.
In Kant’s own texts the concern is with colonialism.