The narrator describes Henry’s careful grooming in ironic terms, claiming, “[n]o belle of a court circle could bestow more mind on a toilet than did [Henry]” (384).
The narrator subtly emasculates Henry by comparing him with a dainty woman, foregrounding the combined problem of Henry’s race and gender.
Fujimoto draws from UC Davis Professor RichŽ Richardson’s work to explore the relations between African-Americans and whites in “The Monster,” and her methods are clearly modeled on Richardson’s as well as upon methods learned in class.
But this is no apprentice paper; she adds an original twist by examining the relations between the white men in the story and provides a fresh interpretation of a mysterious ending that has baffled many critics.
He is immediately marked not as the person, but as the “negro who cared for the doctor’s horses” (Crane 382).
Masteral Thesis In Nursing - Essay The Monster By Stephen Crane
In this short, seemingly innocent description, Crane codes an entire discourse on race politics; Henry’s being a “negro” clearly precludes other possible markers of identity, such as person, man, or human being.Already, before the narrator even describes Henry’s interior thoughts, the problem of Henry’s race is foregrounded.But Henry’s race isn’t the only problem—his conscious and proud masculinity is problematic as well.The film, Richardson writes, shifts the novel’s “emphasis on black female identity and rape to a foregrounding of lynching and black masculinity” (14).Why does the film feature this thematic shift, she asks, and how does this shift affect the ethical standpoint of the film? Help us introduce it to others by writing an introduction for it. Post a New Comment/Question on The Monster Here is where you find links to related content on this site or other sites, possibly including full books or essays about Stephen Crane written by other authors featured on this site. However, as a black hired man, he had washed wagons, and indeed was not a gentleman of position, wealth, and other necessary achievements.The narrator’s fierce irony merely hints at the gravity of Henry’s transgression, thereby foreshadowing a sense of impending doom.While the Henry in The Klansman undergoes an overt emasculation through lynching and castration, the Henry in “The Monster” undergoes a more carefully coded one; he sacrifices his body by running into a burning house to save his white employer’s child, losing his face in the process and experiencing social ostracism as a result.But an allegorical commentary centering on race politics is nonetheless recognizable.