They mistakenly believe that this way of proceeding will convince readers that they have closely read the literature.
They mistakenly believe that this way of proceeding will convince readers that they have closely read the literature.But when the first words of a paragraph are someone else’s name, the author is inadvertently signalling: ‘Here follows a completely derivative paragraph’ — or section if this pattern is repeated.But because of their partly digressive character the author is reluctant to recognize the need to create separate paragraphs to handle them.Tags: Moral Essay TitlesCritical Thinking ExcercisesThe Lipset ThesisResearch Paper In PhysicsStart An Essay About MeBusiness Plans PerthDissertation Font
When and if they look more closely inside the body of the paragraph, readers may also initially skip across token sentences.
And they will normally put off digging into ‘hard’ formulae or tough exposition materials in search of a more intuitive (if approximate) understanding gleaned from the sentences that precede or follow them.
Short paragraphs happen because an author is unsure what to say, or has not properly thought through how a point or a set of points fit together or can be sequenced into the overall argument.
Some reflect miscellanies of points that the author has not acknowledged as such.
So critical readers’ common reaction is to downgrade or skip the paragraph (or sequence of such paragraphs) and move on.
The easy solution to this problem begins by not thinking in terms of individual authors, but focusing instead on the schools of thought, or ‘sides’ in an empirical controversy, that the authors to be cited represent. Then explain the core ideas or propositions of one or more schools of thought involved in the body sentences.In English the core building blocks of any intellectual or research argument are paragraphs.Each paragraphs should be a single unit of thought, a discrete package of ideas composed of closely linked sentences.If they do persevere reading they may not correctly identify the now submerged topic sentence, and then find that the wrap sentence seems unjustified or tendentious, because it does not fit with the apparent topic., for instance: ‘Harding (2007: 593) argues …’ This is a beginning especially beloved of some Ph Ders and other unconfident authors, creeping forward with their argument propped up on the supports of other peoples’ work.Some postgrad students will construct whole sets of paragraphs in this manner, running over several pages, every one of which starts with another author’s name, especially in ‘literature review’ sections.It follows that the beginning and endings of paragraphs should always be the most carefully written materials.Try to separate out these two sentences and look at them together.Or again they may skip forward here, feeling that paragraph 2 only repeats., extending beyond the acceptable research text range of 100-200 words to take up 300 words or more.Often this happens because tokens have multiplied or swollen outside the limits that can be handled easily.The effect is again to bury the real topic sentence one or two sentences deep in the paragraph.Readers may conclude on a quick look that the whole paragraph is just an insubstantial caveat, or navel-gazing of the familiar academic kind, and so skip forward, missing the change of focus completely.