Or finally—a bit of all of these: a little vulgarity, a little gloominess, a little hostility to Christianity, a little thrill, and a need for pepper? The opposite is the case: this utility has rather been an everyday experience throughout the ages, and thus something that has always been constantly re-emphasized.
Hence, instead of disappearing from consciousness, instead of becoming something forgettable, it must have pressed itself into the consciousness with ever-increasing clarity.
This work is perhaps the least aphoristic, in form, of all Nietzsche's productions.
For analytical power, more especially in those parts where Nietzsche examines the ascetic ideal, The Genealogy of Morals is unequalled by any other of his works; and, in the light which it throws upon the attitude of the ecclesiast to the man of resentment and misfortune, it is one of the most valuable contributions to sacerdotal psychology.
Because of this, we are made to feel guilty when acting for ourselves.
This guilt is then reinforced by way of making a creditor and debtor relationship with the world.So, what then, is the motivation behind enacting such an ethic, aside from the feeling of resentment? It does not appear to be a bad thing, as far as humanity goes, to mitigate suffering, to the best of our abilities, so why does Nietzsche condemn the Christians for doing this?Nietzsche regards “ as the serious illness which man was bound to contract under the stress of the most radical change which he has ever experienced - that change, when he found himself finally imprisoned within the pale of society and of peace” (.Rather than standing tall and embracing creativity and ambition, we simply blend into the herd.[Students, teachers, artists, and members of the general public may download and distribute this text free of charge and without permission.With the rise of the postmodernism and the existentialist philosophers in the twentieth century, a new era of post-, Nietzsche proclaimed that “God is dead. And we have killed him.” The message here to take away is that without finding deeper meaning in a religious experience, humanity is bound to find meaning in lesser, material matters of the world. In the twenty-first century, where Capitalism has led to many prosperous times, it has also led to a pernicious consumerism and desire for comfortability.With every aspect of our lives transformed into modern conveniences, we no longer have to bear the suffering of our ancestors, in working toward meaning.Is it a secret, malicious, and common instinct, perhaps one which cannot be acknowledged even to itself, for belittling humanity? The pathos of nobility and distance, as I mentioned, the lasting and dominating feeling, something total and fundamental, of a higher ruling nature in relation to a lower type, to a “beneath”— is the origin of the opposition between “good” and “bad.” (The right of the master to give names extends so far that we could permit ourselves to grasp the origin of language itself as an expression of the power of the rulers: they say “That is such and such”; they seal every object and event with a sound, and in the process, as it were, take possession of it.) Given this origin, the word “good” is from the start ).Or something like a pessimistic suspicion, the mistrust of idealists who’ve become disappointed, gloomy, venomous, and green? And if one is permitted to hope where one cannot know, then I hope from my heart that the situation with these men might be reversed, that these investigators and the ones peering at the soul through their microscopes may be thoroughly brave, generous, and proud animals, who know how to control their hearts and their pain and who at the same time have educated themselves to sacrifice all desirability for the sake of the truth, for the sake of every truth, even the simple, bitter, hateful, repellent, unchristian, immoral truth. And even then, it takes a long time until this instinct in the masses becomes master, so that moral evaluation remains thoroughly hung up on and bogged down in that opposition (as is the case, for example, in modern Europe: today the prejudice that takes “moralistic,” “unegoistic,” and “Secondly, however, and quite apart from the fact that this hypothesis about the origin of the value judgment “good” is historically untenable, it suffers from an inherent psychological contradiction.This is made clear by the laws and customs which we still track up to today, but also the very ethos of personal responsibility and autonomy.The , whether it be for legitimizing political power, or for creative power, in differentiating yourself from the herd, this could be viewed as selfish, or potentially worse as evil.